Individual Wealth Building
Overview \
Support Organizations \ Models
& Best Practices
Research Resources \ Articles-Publications
OVERVIEW
Individual wealth building programs aim to increase the savings
of low and moderate-income individuals. One of the pioneering
efforts in this area was the Individual Development Account
(IDA). Michael Sherraden, a professor at Washington University
in St. Louis, is credited with pioneering the IDA concept.
According to Sherraden, the core elements of the IDA idea
are:
- Special savings account
- Started as early as birth
- Savings are matched for the poor, up to a cap
- May have multiple sources of matching deposits
- Includes financial education component
- May be used for homes, education, and business capital
Individual development accounts illustrate a central feature
of the community wealth-building approach: namely, that to
end poverty, communities—and the people in those communities—must
be given the tools they need to develop their own, long-term
income-generating capacity.
In concept, IDAs are intended to serve as lifelong matched
savings accounts. But as implemented to date, they have been
limited-term accounts that assist low-income families to meet
a specific savings goal. Typically, matched funds must be
spent on specific wealth-building activities, such as home
ownership or renovation, business start-up or expansion, or
education. To date, over 50,000 Americans have participated
in individual development account programs.
Three small federal programs use IDA principles—the
Assets for Independence Act (the official federal IDA program,
which in FY 2007 received an allocation of just under $25
million) of the Office of Community Services; a smaller program
in the Office of Refugee Resettlement (which allows IDAs to
be used to purchase cars or computers); and the Family Self-Sufficiency
(FSS) Program, which permits low-income families who are in
subsidized housing and seeking to move “up and out”
to deposit gains in income they earn in a matched savings
account to finance college or a downpayment and thus speed
their transition to self-sufficiency.
Additionally, there is a long-list of initiatives at early
stages of development. For instance, the Federal Home Loan
Bank of San Francisco runs two downpayment/closing cost match
programs for low-income families who are purchasing homes.
The Chicago-based Council
for Adult & Experiential Learning is running a three-city
demonstration project in which individual savings accounts
are used to finance education and training. Advocates are
also seeking to relax asset limits on benefit programs—as
these discourage the very savings necessary to stay out of
poverty—and to encourage those receiving earned income
tax credit rebates to deposit a portion of their rebates into
matched savings accounts. And in Congress there are efforts
to create childhood savings programs. In Great Britain, Child
Trust Funds, which enable every child on birth to receive
a £250 (about $500 US) voucher from the government to
start a savings account—which can then be increased
by parental and family contributions—were enacted into
law in 2002.
Individual Wealth
Building: Basic Statistics |
| Individual development
accounts, estimated participants to date |
50,000 |
| Number of programs |
540 |
| Average “matched”
withdrawal over 2-year demonstration period |
$2,586 |
| Percent of participants
who saved at least $100 in demonstration project |
56% |
| Average accumulation per
demonstration program participant |
$1,543 |
| Typical savings “match
rate” per dollar saved by program participant |
2:1 |
| Amount invested to date
in IDA matched-purchases |
$168 million |
| Family Self Sufficiency
Program participants as of November 2006 |
68,000 |
| Average FSS Account balance
(2001 HUD report) |
$2,400 |
|